ABSTRACT
Background: Little is known on the impact of COVID-19-associated intensive care medical therapy including extracorporeal life support/membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on the long-term well-being of survivors. The aim of this study is to comprehensively characterize recovery six months after ECMO treatment for COVID-19-associated pulmonary failure. Method(s): All patients requiring veno-venous or veno-arterial ECMO for COVID-19-associated respiratory and/or circulatory failure between April 2020 and September 2021 were included in this retrospective analysis. Parameters included age, gender, time of ECMO treatment, and survival at hospital discharge and 6 months post-ECMO initiation. Comprehensive follow-up covering cardiopulmonary, neurocognitive, psychological, and functional status, as well as the health-related quality of life was assessed in discharged survivors. Result(s): Sixty patients (median age: 60.5 [51.0-65.0] years, range: 20-72 years, 23.3% female) were treated with venovenous or veno-arterial ECMO for severe COVID-19-related pulmonary failure with or without associated circulatory failure. 41.7% (n = 25) were successfully weaned off ECMO after 24.0 (17.5-32.5, range: 10-65) days, and 40.0% (n = 24) survived to hospital discharge. At 6 months post ECMO initiation, 20 patients were alive (33.3% of all patients, 83.3% survival conditioned on survival to discharge). Of these, 19 underwent comprehensive follow-up after 6.0 (5.0-9.0) months (133 months of cumulative follow-up time). 57.9% showed no relevant or only mild deficits, while 26.3% showed moderate, and 15.8% severe deficits. Cardiopulmonary status (mMRC level: 2.0 [1.0-2.0], 84.2% <= 2, NYHA level 2.0 [2.0-3.0], no patient in need of home oxygen) and level of independence (73.7% with no or mild disability and independent in daily life) were satisfactory. The rate of cognitive impairments was substantial (52.6%). In 21.1%, minimal or slight depression was observed, in 26.3% moderate depression, and 15.8% showed signs of post-traumatic stress disorder. Altogether, marked impacts on social and work life were observed. Conclusion(s): ECMO can serve as a salvage therapy for patients with severest COVID-19-related pulmonary failure, but the total burden of deficits six months after ECMO initiation is substantial with effects on social life and work status. The focus of our efforts thus needs to shift from solely acute survival to meaningful long-term recovery.
ABSTRACT
Although treatment options for multiple myeloma (MM) are rapidly evolving, there still remain difficult-to-treat situations, especially in relapsed and/or refractory (r/r) disease. When modern therapies are exhausted, or emergency treatment is needed for high tumor burden, classic chemotherapy combination regimens like the VTd-PACE regimen and its modifications (PACE-M) may also be beneficial as bridging to subsequent treatment options. This single-center retrospective analysis aimed to investigate the outcome of VTd-PACE and PACE-M salvage therapy in 31 heavily pretreated r/r MM patients. The primary objective was the overall response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives were median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), safety, and renal response. Median age was 59 years (range 39-75), and 71% of patients were male. R-ISS stratification showed high-risk MM in 48%. The median number of prior therapies was 3, with 23 patients being triple- and 12 penta-refractory (74% and 39%). ORR was 71%, including 23% of patients achieving a very good partial response. Median duration of follow-up was 15 months (range 0-29 months). mPFS and mOS were 3 months (95% CI 0.27-5.74) and 11 months (95% CI 3.66-18.35), respectively. In 26 patients (83.9%), at least one subsequent treatment (stem cell transplant or BCMA-directed) was administered. Renal function significantly improved after VTd-PACE or PACE-M treatment (p = 0.032). Non-hematological adverse events ≥ grade 3 were predominantly infections. VTd-PACE and PACE-M are effective salvage therapies in difficult-to-treat situations in heavily pre-treated r/r MM, including patients with impaired renal function. VTd-PACE and PACE-M can be successfully used as bridging therapy for subsequent treatment.
ABSTRACT
COVID-19 in immunocompromised patients is difficult to treat. SARS-CoV-2 interaction with the host immune system and the role of therapy still remains only partly understood. There are no data regarding the use of monoclonal antibodies and the combination of two antivirals in fighting viral replication and disease progression. We report the cases of two patients, both treated with rituximab for non-Hodgkin lymphoma and granulomatosis with polyangiitis, respectively, and both hospitalized for COVID-19 with positive SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia, who were successfully treated with a salvage combination therapy with sotrovimab, remdesivir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir.
ABSTRACT
Classical Hodgkin's lymphoma is one of the most treatable lymphoproliferative diseases with current chemotherapy regimens. The 5-year overall survival rate among patients after initial chemotherapy reaches 95 %, however, despite the significant success achieved, the problem of refractoriness/relapse remains very relevant. A standard approach to the treatment of refractory/recurrent Hodgkin's lymphoma among young patients with preserved general status and chemoresponsive to salvage therapy tumor is high-dose consolidation chemotherapy followed by transplantation of autologous hematopoietic stem cells. The intensification of chemotherapy regimens is highly difficult task for a doctor during the COVID-19 pandemic, which requires careful assessment of a risk-benefit ratio. In current conditions, new targeted and immune drugs are used to overcome resistance and reduce toxicity among pretreated patients, which allows not only to improve the results of a treatment, but also to preserve the high quality of life among patients with extremely unfavorable prognosis. we show our experience of using a checkpoint inhibitor in combination with a dose-intensive regimen of DHAp (dexamethasone, cytarabine, cisplatin) in the treatment of a refractory classical Hodgkin's lymphoma followed by high-dose consolidation chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells transplantation, among patients complicated with a new coronavirus infection in the post-transplant period. Copyright © 2022 ABV-Press Publishing House. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Mucormycosis is a life-threatening infection. Mucormycetes causes a wide range of diseases, including pneumonia, rhinosinusitis, internal organ spread, gastrointestinal tract involvement, and skin and soft tissue infection. It infects predominantly with hematological malignancies, transplantation, immunocompromised, and diabetes mellitus patients. The most severe type of the disease is a disseminated disease, which is linked to significant immunosuppression. Currently, this disease is more prevalent in the COVID-19 pandemic because of erroneous steroid use and untreated diabetes. However, there is a scarcity of study and information on the COVID-19 and mucormycosis connection. According to the latest research, mucormycosis cases are rising in developed and developing nations, and only a few therapies are available. The exact burden of mucormycosis is unclear;however, it is likely to be greater than recorded instances due to mucormycosis epidemiological changes. As a result of the delay in identifying this severe illness, appropriate antifungal medications are delayed, resulting in significant morbidity and death. A few drugs are underclinical trials for their efficacy. Other obstacles to treat patients are lack of reliable diagnostic non-invasive tests. This review article draws the attention of its readers and clinicians towards the agents of mucormycosis and discuss the various cases to manage this fungal infection.
ABSTRACT
Background: Venetoclax (Ven) in combination with hypomethylating agents, such as azacitidine (Aza) and low dose cytarabine (LDAC) has been shown to be effective therapy in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and has become standard of care for newly-diagnosed patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy (DiNardo et al., 2020;Wei et al., 2019;Pollyea et al., 2020). Efficacy has also been shown in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting in more limited data sets (Báez-Gutiérrez et al., 2021;Pollyea et al., 2020, Stahl et al., 2020;DiNardo et al., 2019). Ven combination therapy has become widely used in newly-diagnosed patients in the UK since its approval during the COVID-19 pandemic as an alternative to intensive chemotherapy and subsequently for patients unfit for intensive therapy. Aims: We describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with AML or high risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HRMDS) receiving Ven combinations in frontline and R/R settings to provide real-world insight into their use in UK clinical practice. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients with AML or HR-MDS who received Ven combination therapy at University College London Hospital between April 2020 and September 2021. Patient demographics, treatment history and bone marrow results were obtained from electronic health care and laboratory records. Disease stratification and response assessments were made as per European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria (Döhner et al., 2017). Results: At the time of analysis, 95 patients received Ven combinations (61 as frontline treatment and 34 for R/R AML), with a median follow up of 14 months. The majority of patients in both groups had adverse risk ELN classification (70.5% of frontline patients, 64.7% of R/R) and received Ven-Aza (100% frontline and 91.1% R/R) (Table 1). The median ages were 72 and 59 years respectively. The incidence of composite CR/CRi was 70.5% in the frontline setting, with median duration of response (DoR) of 8.3 months and overall survival (OS) of 7.1 months. In R/R AML, the CR/CRi rate was 64.7%, median DoR 10.5 months and median OS 9.8 months. Four out of the 43 patients who achieved CR/CRi (9.3%) following frontline treatment and 9 of the 22 R/R (40.9%) patients proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) post induction. The median survival for all patients who underwent alloSCT is not reached in this analysis. The highest CR/CRi rates were observed in intermediate risk patients (90.9% in frontline treatment, 71.4% in R/R), with lower rates in both favourable (80% and 66.7%) and adverse risk patients (65.1% and 59.1% respectively). The presence of NPM1 and IDH1/2 mutations were associated with high CR/CRi rates in both the frontline (85.7% and 84.6% respectively) and R/R groups (100% and 81.8%), with below average response rates seen in TP53 mutated AML (62% in frontline, 40% in R/R). Notable responses were seen in patients with RUNX1 mutations in both settings (77.8% frontline, 66.6% R/R). Summary/Conclusion: Our data describes real world effectiveness for venetoclax combinations as both frontline and salvage therapy in UK clinical practice, similar to that seen in clinical trials. This further contributes to our understanding of these therapies, in particular their use as a viable treatment option in R/R patients and as a bridge to alloSCT, and highlights the importance of further characterisation of genetic predictors of response to inform treatment decisions in real-world practice.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir/Voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) is the first direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy approved for patients who have previously failed a DAA-containing regimen including NS5A inhibitors. In clinical trials, SOF/VEL/VOX was associated with high rates of sustained virologic response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12) and was well tolerated. However, the effectiveness and safety of SOF/VEL/VOX in the real world remained uncertain. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the real world effectiveness and safety of SOF/VEL/VOX. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for relevant real world studies published before January 28, 2022. Patients with previous treatment failure who received SOF/VEL/VOX were included. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients achieving SVR12. Secondary outcome included adverse events (AEs) during treatment. RESULTS: Fifteen studies with a total of 1796 HCV-infected patients with previous treatment failure were included. SVR12 rates were 93% (95% CI 91-95) in the ITT populations (n = 1517, 11 cohorts) and 96% (95% CI 95-97) in the PP populations (n = 1187, 10 cohorts). SVR12 rates were significantly higher in non-GT3-infected patients (OR = 2.29, 95% CI 1.23-4.27, P = 0.009) and non-cirrhotic patients (OR = 2.22, 95% CI 1.07-4.60, P = 0.03) than in GT3-infected patients and cirrhotic patients. Furthermore, the SVR12 rates of previous treatment of SOF/VEL were significantly lower than those of other regimens in both ITT and PP populations (P ≤ 0.001). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 30% (228/760) of patients. Serious AEs (SAEs) were reported in 3.82% (29/760) of patients. The most frequently reported AEs were headache, asthenia, nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea, which were mostly mild in severity. AE-related treatment discontinuations were reported in 0.66% (5/760) of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with clinical trials, the real world evidence indicates that SOF/VEL/VOX is a well-tolerated and highly effective salvage therapy for HCV-infected patients with previous treatment failure. However, there may still be a risk of treatment failure for patients with GT3 infection, cirrhosis, or SOF/VEL treatment failure. The protocol of this study was registered at PROSPERO, registration no. CRD 42022306828.
ABSTRACT
Introduction:Immunocompromised individuals, such as those with HIV and low CD4 counts, are at increased risk for opportunistic infections. Although uncommon, these patients can be infected with multiple organisms, making diagnosis and management challenging for clinicians. Mortality remains high, as the data on initiating and adjusting antimicrobials when there is concern for co-infection is lacking. We present a case of Pneumocystis jiroveci (PCP) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) coinfection resulting in severe hypoxic respiratory failure and death. Case Report:A 38-year-old male with no past medical history presented with fever, dyspnea, and nonproductive cough. Vital signs were notable for a fever of 102.3°F, respiratory rate of 24, and oxygen saturation of 77% on room air. Physical examination revealed an ill-appearing male with bilateral rhonchi who became dyspneic with minimal conversation. Laboratory studies were significant for an elevated c-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, ferritin and lactate dehydrogenase. CT chest demonstrated bilateral ground glass opacities with multifocal consolidations. The patient was admitted for hypoxic respiratory failure secondary to suspected COVID pneumonia, despite negative testing. By hospital day 4, the patient had shown little improvement. Further work-up revealed that he was HIV positive with a CD4 count of 5, so he was empirically started on oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMPSMX) for presumed PCP pneumonia. On hospital day 9, the patient underwent endotracheal intubation for worsening hypoxia and subsequent bronchoscopy for further evaluation. PCP PCR confirmed the diagnosis, and the patient was transitioned to intravenous TMP-SMX. Still with minimal improvement, micafungin was added as potential salvage therapy. After 12 days of TMPSMX, treatment was changed to clindamycin/primaquine. CMV PCR from the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid came back positive at this time, so ganciclovir was added to the regimen. Despite multiple antimicrobials, the patient continued to decline. He was deemed not to be a candidate for ECMO given his profoundly immunocompromised status and ultimately died. Discussion:This case highlights the difficulties clinicians have in managing severely immunocompromised patients who worsen despite appropriate care. Little data exists providing guidelines on when to change to second and/or third-line agents in treating PCP pneumonia. Additionally, further studies need to be completed to delineate in whom empiric antimicrobials should be initiated early when co-infection is a possibility. ECMO may serve a purpose in this patient population given that lung rest is necessary to allow healing, but only a few cases of its use exist at this time.
ABSTRACT
Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients presenting a relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease are currently managed with salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). However, almost 25-30% of these patients fail to achieve a complete response (CR) with standard salvage regimens. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the efficacy of a combination of brentuximab vedotin (BV) and pembrolizumab in a series of HL patients presenting with a high-risk, multi-refractory disease. Patients achieving a Deauville score ≤4 proceeded to ASCT consolidation. After ASCT, patients received BV as maintenance for a total of 16 administrations. We collected data from 10 patients with a median age of 30.7 years. At a median follow-up of 16.5 months, we reported a complete metabolic remission (CMR) in eight patients (80%), with seven patients (70%) directly proceeding to ASCT (the other two patients in CMR are still undergoing treatment). BV consolidation was started in six patients and completed by three patients (one ongoing, two interruption). Two patients (20%) presented a progressive disease (PD) and subsequently died, while the others are still in CMR. The BV and pembrolizumab combination is a very effective bridge treatment to ASCT for high-risk R/R HL patients.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Vasoplegia is defined as a refractory shock state with profound hypotension in the setting of reduced systemic vascular resistance and high cardiac output. Lung transplantation is an arduous surgery often requiring cardiopulmonary bypass, which ultimately predisposes to vasoplegia. We detail the treatment of a patient with end-stage lung disease secondary to COVID-19 pneumonia undergoing lung transplant who developed vasoplegia. DESCRIPTION: The patient is a 36-year-old female who was admitted with profound hypoxemic respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 pneumonia. Despite initial therapy, she remained ventilator-dependent with need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. Given her single organ failure status - lungs being solely affected - she was promptly considered for lung transplant evaluation upon resolution of her active SARS-CoV-2 infection. She was ultimately deemed appropriate for listing and underwent subsequent transplant. The surgery required the use of cardiopulmonary bypass, given the extensive adhesions of the native COVID-19-infected lungs. The lungs were, unfortunately, quite necrotic, with multiple purulent pockets. She was profoundly hypotensive throughout the surgery and required massive fluid resuscitation, as well as multiple vasopressors. In the setting of this vasoplegia, she received multiple doses of methylene blue at 2 mg/kg, with only marginal improvement in blood pressure. Decision was made to add high-dose (5 g) hydroxocobalamin in an attempt to synergistically stabilize blood pressure. Intraoperatively, her blood pressure stabilized within hours;she remained on ECMO support and was transferred to the ICU postoperatively. Eventually, she was slowly weaned from her vasopressors, with stable blood pressure. DISCUSSION: Methylene blue mechanistically inhibits inducible nitric oxide synthase and guanylyl cyclase, while hydroxycobalamin acts as a nitric oxide scavenger. Both agents have been used independently to treat vasoplegia during cardiopulmonary bypass. Together, they may be used as a salvage therapy to improve blood pressure in refractory cases of shock seemingly exacerbated by the cytokine milieu promoted by recent SARS-CoV-2 infection.
ABSTRACT
Severe acute respiratory syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), has rapidly spread all over the world and has become a public health emergency. Coronavirus disease-2019 has a wide clinical spectrum, from asymptomatic infection to Acute respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis, metabolic acidosis, coagulation disorder, multi-organ failure and even death. The dysregulated and hyperimmune response to SARS-CoV-2 could possibly explain the highly variable disease manifestations and play an important role in the pathogenesis of COVID-19. Since there is no specific antiviral treatment in the treatment of COVID-19, treatments for inflammation against the virus and sharing experience are important. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have potent anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory abilities that can migrate to damaged tissues, promote tissue regeneration, and inhibit tissue fibrosis. Today, MSCs are widely used in many clinical studies on immune-mediated inflammatory diseases such as Graft-versus-Host disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, and perianal Crohn's disease. MSC treatment in COVID-19 is a promising option. In this study, we would present four patients with COVID-19 who were treated with MSCs and who were found to be positive for real-time polymerase chain reaction tests on nasopharyngeal swab or tracheal aspirate. All patients were critically ill were followed up with mechanical ventilator due to severe hypoxemia. One patient was extubated and discharged. Other patients died. In this study, MSCs were used as salvage therapy in the late period, so benefit might not be seen. In previous studies, this treatment was used earlier and there were results showing the benefits of MSCs. Based on this study, MSCs can be a promising treatment option when used in the appropriate patient at the appropriate time.
ABSTRACT
B Introduction: b Mucormycosis carries significant mortality, overall upwards of 47%;pulmonary involvement rates can be as high as 87%. While pulmonary mucormycosis has been well-described in the COVID-19 population, we report on a case of successful medical treatment of pulmonary mucormycosis in a post-partum patient on VV-ECMO for COVID-19 ARDS, which is the first to our knowledge. [Extracted from the article] Copyright of Critical Care Medicine is the property of Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
ABSTRACT
RTPA regimen was approximated in each patient to receive a bolus of 0.5-1 mg/kg and a subsequent infusion rate of 1-5 mg/kg/hr actively titrated by the ICU Attending physician, guided by serial fibrinogen levels. B Methods: b Following IRB approval, retrospective data was collected from 5 patients with severe, prolonged (>10 days hypoxemia) COVID-19, from April to May, 2020 that received bolus and infusion rTPA followed by apixaban and clopidogrel at conclusion of rTPA infusion. B Results: b 2 of the 5 patients encountered bleeding at central lines within 6 hours of rTPA bolus, to prompt the Intensivist to pause the rTPA infusion and apply PRBC support. [Extracted from the article] Copyright of Critical Care Medicine is the property of Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Patients with therapy-related AML (t-AML) or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) are a known high-risk AML subgroup with historically poor outcomes. In December 2018, CPX-351 (Vyxeos ® Liposomal) received a positive reimbursement decision in England for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed t-AML or AML-MRC. The objective of this retrospective study was to utilize the Cancer Analysis System (CAS) database available through the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS) to describe the demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment pathways for patients with t-AML or AML-MRC in England from 2013 to 2020, including the use of CPX-351. Methods: The NCRAS systematically collects and curates population-level data about cancer diagnoses, treatments, and outcomes across England. Adults (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with t-AML or AML-MRC between January 2013 and March 2020 were identified either directly using International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition(ICD-O-3) codes or indirectly using non-specific ICD-O-2, ICD-O-3, or ICD-10 AML codes in combination with a record of prior systemic anticancer therapy or radiotherapy (t-AML) or a prior diagnosis of MDS or CMML (AML-MRC;other AML-MRC subtypes could not be distinguished from de novo AML). First-line and second-line treatments identified included clinical trials, intensive chemotherapy (IC) treatments (CPX-351;daunorubicin plus cytarabine [DA];fludarabine, cytarabine, idarubicin and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor [FLAG-Ida];or “other IC” consisting of mitoxantrone-based therapy or high-dose cytarabine alone), or less-intensive therapies (azacitidine, low-dose cytarabine [LDAC], or hydroxycarbamide alone). Patients who did not receive active systemic therapy (ie, those who received best supportive care alone) were not included. Results: A total of 2,891 patients with t-AML or AML-MRC were identified. Most patients were male (62%), white (91%), and aged ≥60 years (80%). Overall, 590 (20%) patients received first-line treatment in a clinical trial, 1,474 (51%) received less-intensive therapy, and 827 (29%) received an IC regimen. Patients aged ≥60 years at diagnosis were less likely than those aged <60 years to either enter a clinical trial (18% vs 32%, respectively) or receive IC (22% vs 54%). In patients treated with IC, those who received CPX-351 were slightly older (mean [standard deviation] age: 63.9 years [8.3]) than those who received DA (60.5 years [11.4]) or FLAG-Ida (55.6 years [12.6]);28% of patients treated with CPX-351 were aged <60 years compared to 37% for DA and 55% for FLAG-Ida. When treatment patterns were analyzed per annum, utilization of less-intensive therapies remained stable over time (Figure 1A). Azacitidine was the most common less-intensive therapy both overall (64%) and across all yearly time points, followed overall by LDAC (22%) then hydroxycarbamide alone (14%). In contrast, the IC treatment patterns were more dynamic over time (Figure 1B). DA chemotherapy was the most common IC overall (48%), followed by FLAG-Ida (23%) and other ICs (18%). However, CPX-351 uptake started in 2018 (5% of all IC) and by the end of 2019 had displaced DA chemotherapy as standard-of-care IC (40% vs 22%, respectively). Excluding patients who were alive but had not received subsequent therapy (ie, censored), most patients who received front-line azacitidine or LDAC died without receiving salvage therapy (89% and 92%, respectively). In comparison, non-censored patients who received front-line DA chemotherapy or FLAG-Ida were more likely to receive salvage treatment (52% and 34%, respectively). Key salvage treatments following DA included azacitidine alone and FLAG-based therapy. Key salvage treatments following front-line CPX-351 included FLAG-Ida or DA ± hematopoietic cell transplant and azacitidine. Conclusions: This large population-level, retrospective analysis of CAS data provides a detailed overview of the management of patients with t-AML and AML-MRC. Historically a high proportion of these high-risk patients have received less-intensive treatment. Since 2018, CPX-351 has been rapidly adopted into the IC treatment pathway, displacing DA chemotherapy. These analyses will be repeated after the CAS database has been updated to determine the impact of COVID-19. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Legg: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Muzwidzwa: IQVIA Inc., which was contracted by Jazz Pharmaceuticals for the conduct of this analysis: Current Employment. Adamson: IQVIA Inc., which was contracted by Jazz Pharmaceuticals for the conduct of this analysis: Current Employment. Wilkes: IQVIA Inc., which was contracted by Jazz Pharmaceuticals for the conduct of this analysis: Current Employment. Medalla: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: CPX-351 (US: Vyxeos ®;Europe: Vyxeos ® Liposomal) is a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine in a synergistic 1:5 molar ratio. Since November 2018, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has recommended its use for adults with newly diagnosed, therapy-related AML (t-AML) or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) due to either prior myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) or de novo AML with myelodysplasia-related cytogenetic changes. The key aims of this study were to utilize the Cancer Analysis System (CAS) database available through the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS) to describe the demographics and clinical characteristics of adults with AML in England who have received CPX-351, as well as to estimate overall survival (OS) and survival within stratifications of interest. Methods: The NCRAS systematically collects and curates population-level data about cancer diagnoses, treatments, and outcomes across England. Adults (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with AML and treated with CPX-351 were included in this study. A diagnosis of t-AML or AML-MRC between January 2013 and March 2020 was determined either directly using International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition (ICD-O-3) codes or indirectly using non-specific ICD-O-2, ICD-O-3, or ICD-10 AML codes in combination with either prior systemic anticancer therapy or radiotherapy (t-AML) or a prior diagnosis of MDS or CMML (AML-MRC;other AML-MRC subtypes could not be specifically identified and are included within the de novo AML subgroup). OS was measured from the date of diagnosis;a separate analysis of OS landmarked from the date of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) was also performed. Within this preliminary analysis, no OS adjustments have been made to account for any COVID-19-related deaths. Results: A total of 172 patients with AML who were treated with CPX-351 were identified: 37 (22%) had t-AML, 57 (33%) had AML-MRC, and 78 (45%) had de novo AML. At diagnosis, the mean (standard deviation) age was 62.8 years (10.1), with 49/172 (28%) patients aged <60 years;66% of patients were male;87% were white;and most had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 (68%). Six (3%) patients had received azacitidine treatment for a prior malignancy. To date, 43/172 (25%) patients had undergone HCT overall, including 43/97 (44%) patients with ≥3 months of follow-up. The cut-off date for OS was December 31, 2020, giving a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 11.2 months (3.6, 16.9). Overall, 91 patients had died, with an estimated median OS (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 16.6 months (11.0, not estimable) and probability of survival (95% CI) at 1 and 2 years of 0.54 (0.47, 0.62) and 0.39 (0.30, 0.50), respectively (Figure 1). Early mortality rates were 7% at 30 days and 15% at 60 days. When OS was landmarked from the date of HCT, median OS was not reached, with a probability of survival (95% CI) at 1 year of 0.74 (0.62, 0.89;Figure 2). When stratified by age, estimated median OS (95% CI) was not reached for patients aged <60 years and 12.8 months (8.9, 17.6) for patients aged ≥60 years. In a treatment patterns analysis that evaluated second-line treatments after CPX-351, 68 patients died without salvage therapy and 64 were alive without receiving subsequent therapy by the end of the study period. The most common salvage treatments were fludarabine, cytarabine, idarubicin, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (FLAG-Ida;n = 15), daunorubicin plus cytarabine (DA)-based therapy (n = 6), and azacitidine alone (n = 7). Of the 43 patients who received an HCT, 6 (14%) underwent HCT following salvage therapy. Conclusions: This is the largest study to date examining the real-world outcomes for patients with AML who were treated with CPX-351. The estimated median OS of 16.6 months is consistent with reported real-world outcomes for CPX-351 in French and Italian studies. Median OS has not been reached in patients aged <60 years or when landmarked from the date of HCT. Once the CAS database has been updated, these analyses will be repeated to increase follow-up and patient numbers and to determine the impact of COVID-19 on OS following CPX-351 treatment. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Legg: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Doubleday: IQVIA Inc., which was contracted by Jazz Pharmaceuticals for the conduct of this analysis: Current Employment. Reich: IQVIA Inc., which was contracted by Jazz Pharmaceuticals for the conduct of this analysis: Current Employment. Lambova: IQVIA Inc., which was contracted by Jazz Pharmaceuticals for the conduct of this analysis: Current Employment. Medalla: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.
ABSTRACT
On behalf of the GRAALL group, the Czech Republic ALL group, the Finland ALL group and the EWALL group. Introduction. Treatment of older patients (pts) with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) remains an unmet medical need. Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO), an anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, is approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL in adults, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) being the major adverse event associated with INO. A previous first line study conducted by the MDACC in pts 60 years or older successfully used INO in combination with a lower intensity version of the hyper-CVAD (mini-hyper-CVD). Due to the occurrence of SOS, the total doses were fixed at 1.3 mg/m² for cycle 1 followed by 3 cycles at 1 mg/m² (Kantarjian H et al. Lancet Oncol, 2018). Here, we aimed to assess the activity and safety of fractionated INO at a reduced dosage in combination with low-intensity chemotherapy as frontline therapy for older pts with CD22+ Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-neg) BCP-ALL. Methods. EWALL-INO is a single arm prospective phase 2 multicentric study conducted in European centers belonging to the EWALL group. Eligibility criteria were pts aged 55y or older, performance status ≤2, and newly diagnosed CD22+ (20% or more of positive blast cells) Ph-neg BCP-ALL without central nervous system involvement. After a prephase including 5 days (D) of dexamethasone (DEX) 10mg per D and a single intrathecal injection (IT), the induction regimen was begun and split in 2 parts. Induction part I (Induc1) consisted of one triple IT, vincristine (VCR) 2 mg (1 mg over 70y) D1 D8 D15 D22 and DEX 20 mg D1D2 D8D9 D15D16 D22D23 combined with 3 injections of INO (0.8 mg/m² D1, 0.5 mg/m² D8 and D15). Induction part II (Induc2) was offered to pts in CR or CRp (CR with platelets < 100 G/l) after Induc1 or as salvage therapy. Induc2 consisted of DEX 20mg D1D8, cyclophosphamide (CY) 300 mg/m² D1 to D3, one triple IT D2 and 2 injections of INO (0.5 mg/m² D1 and D8). Pts in CR/CRp were programmed to receive 6 blocks of consolidation (Ara-C 1.5g/m²/12h adapted to renal clearance D1D2 and DEX 10mg/12h D1D2, cycles 1 and 4;Methotrexate (MTX) 1.5 g/m² over 24h D1, VCR 1 or 2 mg D1, one triple IT D2 and 6-mercaptopurin (6-MP) D1 to D7, cycles 2 and 5;CY 500 mg/m² D1D2, VP16 75 mg/m² D1D2, one triple IT D2 and MTX 25 mg/m² D1, cycles 3 and 6) followed by a POMP maintenance (VCR, 6-MP, MTX, DEX) during 18 months. Allograft was allowed after at least 3 blocks of consolidation at the discretion of the investigators. The evaluable population was pts who received at least 1 dose of INO. Analyses were by modified intention to treat and performed JUN 28, 2021. All pts gave informed consent. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the NCT number: NCT03249870. Results. Between DEC 29, 2017 and JUN 22, 2021, 115 pts (out of 130 planned pts) were enrolled including 6 pts with screen failure. The first 90 eligible pts (up to MAR 1, 2021) were considered for this analysis to obtain a minimum of 4 months follow-up. Median age was 69y (range 55-84) and median follow-up for alive pts was 1.18 years (range 0.3-3.5). At time of analysis, 90 and 88 pts had started induc1 and induc2, respectively. Treatment related mortality was 2.2% (2/90) and CR/CRp rate was 85.5% (77/90, 6 CRp) after induc1. Three cases relapsed between induc1 and induc2 and 5 pts were salvaged by induc2 allowing to a CR/CRp rate of 87.7% (79/90, 8 CRp) after induc2. One pts died from refractory disease during induc2. One, 2, 3 4 and 5 injections of INO were administered to 2 (2.2%), 2(2.2%), 11 (12.2%), 2 (2.2%) and 73 pts (81.1%) respectively. Only 6 pts were allografted. One-year OS was estimated to be 78.5% (95%CI 68-85.9) and median OS was not reached. One-year relapse free survival was 74.5% (95CI 63.5-82.6) (Figure 1). Grade 3-4 liver toxicity was observed in 8 pts (8.8%) during the study including 3 pts (3.3%) developing SOS, 2 related to INO during induc1 and one occurred after transplant. Twenty-nine pts died during the follow-up, 16 from relapses (overall incidence 18%) and 13 from adverse events (overall incidence 14.4%), including one COVID19 fatal infection during consolidation. Conclusion. Fractionated inotuzumab ozogamicin at reduced doses (0.8/0.5/0.5/0.5 mg/m²) combined with low-intensity chemotherapy is a very active and well tolerated frontline therapy for older patients with CD22+ Ph-neg BCP-ALL. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Doubek: Janssen-Cilag, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Gilead, Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Huguet: Novartis: Other: Advisor;Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisor;Celgene: Other: Advisor;BMS: Other: Advisor;Amgen: Other: Advisor;Pfizer: Other: Advisor. Raffoux: ABBVIE: Consultancy;PFIZER: Consultancy;CELGENE/BMS: Consultancy;ASTELLAS: Consultancy. Boissel: CELGENE: Honoraria;Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria;Incyte: Honoraria;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding;PFIZER: Consultancy, Honoraria;JAZZ Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding;SANOFI: Honoraria. Dombret: Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding;Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding;Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding;Novartis: Research Funding;Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding;Servier: Research Funding;Abbvie: Honoraria;BMS-Celgene: Honoraria;Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria. Rousselot: Incyte, Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Inotuzumab ozogamicin as first line therapy in newly diagnosed CD22+ Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia
ABSTRACT
Background: Brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) is the first CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy approved for use in patients (pts) with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). The ZUMA-2 trial demonstrated that brexu-cel induces durable remissions in these pts with an ORR of 85% (59% CR), estimated 12-month PFS rate of 61%, and similar toxicity profile to other CAR T therapies (Wang et al, NEJM 2020). We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study of pts treated with commercial brexu-cel to evaluate its safety and efficacy in the non-trial setting. Methods: We reviewed records of pts with relapsed MCL across 12 US academic medical centers. Pts who underwent leukapheresis between July 2020 and June 2021 with the intent to proceed to commercial brexu-cel were included. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate models were fit to identify predictors of post-CAR T outcomes. Results: Fifty-five pts underwent leukapheresis. There were 3 manufacturing failures. Baseline characteristics of the 52 pts who received brexu-cel are summarized in Table 1. Median age was 66 yrs (range: 47-79 yrs) and 82% were male. Twenty of 29 (69%) pts with known baseline MIPI were intermediate or high risk. Seven pts had a history of CNS involvement. The median number of prior therapies was 3 (range: 2-8), including prior autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in 21 (40%) and prior allogeneic transplant in 2 pts (1 with prior ASCT and 1 without). Fifty percent had relapsed within 24 months of their initial therapy. All pts had previously received a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), including 29 (56%) with disease progression on a BTKi. Forty (77%) pts received bridging therapy (17 BTKi, 10 BTKi + venetoclax, 6 chemo, 3 venetoclax, 2 XRT only, 1 steroids only, 1 lenalidomide + rituximab). The ORR was 88% (CR 69%) among patients who received brexu-cel. Two pts had PD on initial restaging and 3 died prior to first response assessment (without evidence of relapse). Seven pts have not completed restaging due to limited follow-up (< 3 months) and were not included in the response assessment. Five pts have progressed, including 2 with CR and 1 with PR on initial restaging. With a median follow-up of 4.2 months, the estimated 6-month PFS and OS rates were 82.7% and 89.0%, respectively. All 7 pts with prior CNS involvement were alive without relapse at last follow-up. The incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was 84% (10% grade ≥ 3) with a median time to max grade of 5 days (range: 0-10 days). There were no cases of grade 5 CRS. The incidence of neurotoxicity (NT) was 57% (31% grade ≥ 3) with a median time to onset of 7 days (range: 4-15 days). NT occurred in 4/7 pts with prior CNS involvement (3 grade 3, 1 grade 4). Grade 5 NT occurred in 1 pt who developed cerebral edema and died 8 days after infusion. Thirty-five pts received tocilizumab, 33 received steroids, 7 received anakinra, and 1 received siltuximab for management of CRS and/or NT. Post-CAR T infections occurred in 8 pts, including two grade 5 infectious AEs (covid19 on day +80 and septic shock on day +40 after infusion). Rates of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were 38% and 37%, respectively. Among pts with at least 100 days of follow-up and lab data available, 5/34 (15%) had persistent grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and 4/34 (12%) had persistent grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia at day +100. Five pts have died, with causes of death being disease progression (2), septic shock (1), NT (1), and covid19 (1). Univariate analysis did not reveal any significant associations between survival and baseline/pre-CAR T MIPI, tumor pathologic or cytogenetic features, prior therapies, receipt of steroids/tocilizumab, or pre-CAR T tumor bulk. Conclusions: This analysis of relapsed MCL pts treated with commercial brexu-cel reveals nearly identical response and toxicity rates compared to those reported on ZUMA-2. Longer follow-up is require to confirm durability of response, but these results corroborate the efficacy of brexu-cel in a population of older adults with high-risk disease features. While all 7 pts with prior CNS involvement are alive and in remission, strategies to mitigate the risk of NT in this setting need to be evaluated. Further studies to define the optimal timing of CAR T, bridging strategies, and salvage therapies for post-CAR T relapse in MCL are warranted. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Gerson: TG Therapeutics: Consultancy;Kite: Consultancy;Abbvie: Consultancy;Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Sawalha: TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding;Celgene/BMS: Research Funding;BeiGene: Research Funding;Epizyme: Consultancy. Bond: Kite/Gilead: Honoraria. Karmali: Janssen/Pharmacyclics: Consultancy;BeiGene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau;Morphosys: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau;Takeda: Research Funding;Genentech: Consultancy;AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau;Roche: Consultancy;Karyopharm: Consultancy;Epizyme: Consultancy;Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;BMS/Celgene/Juno: Consultancy, Research Funding;EUSA: Consultancy. Torka: TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chow: ADC Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Research Funding;AstraZeneca: Research Funding. Shadman: Abbvie, Genentech, AstraZeneca, Sound Biologics, Pharmacyclics, Beigene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Morphosys, TG Therapeutics, Innate Pharma, Kite Pharma, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Epizyme, Eli Lilly, Adaptimmune, Mustang Bio and Atara Biotherapeutics: Consultancy;Mustang Bio, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pharmacyclics, Gilead, Genentech, Abbvie, TG Therapeutics, Beigene, AstraZeneca, Sunesis, Atara Biotherapeutics, GenMab: Research Funding. Ghosh: Genentech: Research Funding;Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Karyopharma: Consultancy, Honoraria;Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria;Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Genmab: Consultancy, Honoraria;Epizyme: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria;Adaptive Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria;AbbVie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Moyo: Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Fenske: TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau;Servier Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy;Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau;Sanofi: Speakers Bureau;Pharmacyclics: Consultancy;MorphoSys: Consultancy;Kite (Gilead): Speakers Bureau;KaryoPharm: Consultancy;CSL Therapeutics: Consultancy;Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau;Biogen: Consultancy;Beigene: Consultancy;AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau;ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy;Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy;AbbVie: Consultancy. Grover: Genentech: Research Funding;Novartis: Consultancy;ADC: Other: Advisory Board;Kite: Other: Advisory Board;Tessa: Consultancy. Maddocks: Seattle Genetics: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months;BMS: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months;Pharmacyclics: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months;Novatis: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months;Janssen: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months;Morphosys: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months;ADC Therapeutics: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months;Karyopharm: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months;Beigene: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months;Merck: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months;KITE: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months;Celgene: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Jacobson: Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support;Humanigen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support;Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support;Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding;Lonza: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support;AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria;Precision Biosciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support;Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support;Nkarta: Consultancy, Honoraria;Axis: Speakers Bureau;Clinical Care Options: Speakers Bureau. Cohen: Janssen, Adaptive, Aptitude Health, BeiGene, Cellectar, Adicet, Loxo/Lilly, AStra ZenecaKite/Gilead: Consultancy;Genentech, Takeda, BMS/Celgene, BioInvent, LAM, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Loxo/Lilly: Research Funding.
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study is Recently there is an alarming increase in the incidence of mucormycosis in patients diagnosed with Covid-19. In this short review, we will discuss the basic principles of mucormycosis treatment, antifungal agents used along with update on pharmacotherapeutic guidelines recommended for management of mucormycosis. Searching the Pubmed with the key words “mucormycosis and covid 19 ”, “ Treatment of mucormycosis”, “ antifungal used in Mucormycosis revealed many articles, and the relevant articles were screened. Mucormycosis is an aggressive disease which is difficult to diagnose in early stage with high morbidity and mortality. Multimodal therapeutic approach consisting of early diagnosis, urgent surgical and medical intervention and elimination of predisposing factors is key to successful management of this condition. First-line antifungal agent is high-dose liposomal amphotericin B although amphotericin B deoxycholate may be the viable option in resource limited settings.
ABSTRACT
Introduction & Objective: Due to the COVID-19 global pandemic, in July 2020 we developed a same day discharge (SDD) protocol for robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) that balanced safety concerns with benefits of early discharge. In this study we present our experience and protocol. Methods: We performed a prospective analysis of patients undergoing RALP who were selected for SDD in a high-volume prostate cancer referral center. The criteria for discharge included uncomplicated surgery, stable postoperative hemoglobin, ambulation, tolerance of clear liquids without nausea or vomiting, pain control with oral medication, and patient/family comfort with SDD. We excluded patients older than 70 years, having concomitant general surgery operations, significant comorbidities (e.g. cardiopulmonary disease), and challenging procedures (e.g. salvage procedure, large prostates). We analyzed patient demographics, clinicopathologic factors, and operative outcomes and evaluated rates of SDD and factors associated with SDD failure (SDF). Results: From July 13, 2020 to January 1, 2021, 101 patients undergoing RALP were selected for SDD. Eighty patients (79%) met criteria , 73 (72%) were successful SDD, and 28 (28%) were SDF. All the SDF were discharged on postoperative day 1. Preoperative demographics were similar between the two groups with a median age of 63 (57-67) years and median BMI of 27 (25-30) kg/m2. Intraoperative characteristics were not statistically different with a median operative time of 92 (81-107) vs 103 (91-111) minutes for SDD and SDF respectively (P = 0.51). The readmission in the SDD group was due to dizziness from hematoma and ileus from urine leak in the SDF cohort (P = 0.69). Of the 28 SDF patients, the most common reasons for staying were anesthesia-related factors of nausea (35%) and drowsiness (7%), followed by patient/caregiver preference (25%), pain (14%), labile blood pressure (7%), arrhythmia (7%), and dizziness (7%). Conclusions: SDD for patients undergoing RALP can be safely incorporated into a clinical care pathway without increasing readmission rates. Coordinated care with anesthesia and nursing teams is an integral part of developing a SDD program, as is preoperative counseling to manage expectations. Future aims will be to investigate anesthesia factors leading to nausea and to expand selection to more patients.